Fabric readiness assessment
Review reporting estate, data sources, skills, governance, licensing and architecture drivers.
National Power BI service
Ultron helps Power BI teams assess when Microsoft Fabric is useful, when standard Power BI is sufficient and how to plan a sensible adoption path.
Scope
Review reporting estate, data sources, skills, governance, licensing and architecture drivers.
Compare semantic models, dataflows, lakehouse, warehouse and pipeline patterns for your use case.
Plan how Fabric items, semantic models, workspaces and reporting assets should work together.
Prioritise pilots, governance, migration sequence, training and support needs.
Use cases
The right scope depends on your current reporting estate, stakeholders, source data and support model.
Delivery
Identify the specific problems Fabric would solve and where standard Power BI may already be enough.
Map data flows, workspaces, semantic models, governance and responsibilities.
Build a focused proof point that tests value, complexity and operating model.
Recommend next steps, including when to continue with standard Power BI instead.
Related services
Share the reporting problem, source systems and audience. We will recommend a focused path for this service and whether a broader implementation or governance engagement is needed.
FAQs
No. Standard Power BI may be sufficient when reporting can be solved with better models, DAX, governance or refresh design.
Fabric can be useful when data engineering, lakehouse, warehouse, cross-team reuse or unified governance needs justify the additional platform complexity.
Yes. We can assess current reporting, data sources, skills, governance and candidate use cases before recommending a pilot or migration path.
Yes. Semantic model design remains central because reports still depend on trusted measures, relationships, security and performance.
Australian delivery proof
Review approved Australian client stories across Power Apps, Power BI, Dataverse, healthcare, mining and manufacturing.